I believe MS EXCEL may rethink into bringing out a new version of Excel with some predefined library functions which makes programing easier for AI ML in excel.This required a convolutional neural network the engine behind just about all machine learning related to images.
Im unaware of anyone else who has done this in Excel so please let me know if you come across others. Im currently working through Andrew Ngs brilliant Deep Learning course on Coursera and Ive reached Course 4, Week 3. Throughout the course, Ive been building out the neural net architectures he describes in Excel. Eminem slim shady lp 320 zip sharebeastExcel is not yet the right medium to build convolutional neural nets for real-world applications. However, I know Excel and find it easier to construct these on a spreadsheet rather than in a new language. Neural Network With Excel Book Code And ItExcel gives a less abstract view of a neural net than vectorised Python code and it helped me immensely in developing an understanding of these fantastic new tools. Neural networks are very robust to bugs, in fact, they often continue to learn but fail in odd and interesting ways. I would also argue that the speed of Excel gives you time to think as the failures manifest themselves. This relates to Yann LeCuns data set of 60,000 handwritten digits (0 to 9) with an associated 10,000-digit test set. Yann has made this data available to all and there are plenty of higher level language examples. After several silly but informative mistakes, I completed the model below last night and would welcome your thoughts. By way of a full description, there are two convolutional layers with max pooling taking the images of the handwritten digits from 28h x 28w pixels to 24h x 24w x 4c (4 channels) and 12h x 12w x 4c after max pooling. Layer 2 condensed these to 8h x 8w x 8c and then 4h x 4w x 8c after max pooling. The final two fully connected layers had 15 and 10 neurons respectively. Giving a grand total of 936 convolutional parameters and 2,095 in the fully connected layers. This doesnt sound like a lot of space to capture the vagaries of human handwriting, but it does. On its first 100k iterations Im seeing 98.75 accuracy on the training data and 98 on the test data. I would love to know what human accuracy levels on this data are but from my experience, its not much more than this. Any expressions of interest prior to this would also be welcome. Id like to know if there is a way I can download your excel file If not I do understand. Scrivener keygen macRegards. I have been looking for something like that on YouTube for quite some time. Other than Mike Pallisters video, I couldnt find much of this great level.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorStacey ArchivesCategories |